
A well-known Old Testament story is that of Jephthah and of how he found himself forced to sacrifice his daughter in consequence of a vow he had rashly made. It is told in
Judges 11:1-40, but outside the Bible, too, the myth recurs in various forms, e.g. in Mozart's
Idomeneo. Giacomo Carissimi (1605-1674) molded it into his masterpiece,
Jephte. Probably composed for performance during Lent, it is an oratorio, a kind of large-scale cantata or, more strictly speaking, a type of church opera distinguished from its theatrical counterparts only by the fact that it was not produced in costume and with scenery on a stage. It was a new form which Carissimi, the outstanding Italian composer between Monteverdi and Alessandro Scarlatti, endowed with structural unity and brought to full perfection.
The oratorio was composed after Carissimi had been placed in charge of music at the church of Sant'Appolinare in Rome (1630). Twenty years later it was still so well known that the Jesuit scholar and musicologist Athanasius Kircher used it as an example complete with musical quotations in his
Musurgia Universalis. He described it as being "succo et vivacitate plena" (pulsing with life and vitality), and may well have become acquainted with it at the socially fashionable Oratorio del Crocefisso di San Marcello; from here hand-written copies soon spread its fame across the Alps.
Despite its somewhat aristocratic origins,
Jephte is really a popular work, not a work for the connoisseur. Its choruses have about them an elemental force reminiscent of Monteverdi's "Madrigals of War", while its arias do not as yet conform to the already popular "da capo" scheme, and are primarily aimed at expressing the words of the text as effectively as possible. The narrative aspect of the oratorio, i.e. the part of the "Historicus" of narrator, is kept deliberately simple and direct so as to hold the attention of the audience.
A glance at the artistic development of the composer Hans Werner Henze (born 1926) soon explains his interest in Carissimi's
Jephte. He was a private pupil of Wolfgang Fortner at the Institute for Church Music at Heidelberg, and that is doubtless where he first met Carissimi's oratorio. When, later, he was working with the theatres at Constance and Wiesbaden and turning more and more to the theatre in his own music, the idea of his updating Carissimi's score began to seem to him as desirable as the modernization of Handel's oratorios had seemed to Mozart when he was involved with Baron van Swieten's Sunday concerts.
Henze left the vocal parts intact, and confined himself to expanding the orchestration in line with authentic baroque practice. What Carissimi gives to a handful of strings and a basso continuo - and even in those days other instruments were used, e.g. a continuo harp - Henze rescores for a colorful ensemble with four flutes (including piccolo, bass and double-bass flutes), mandolin, guitar, tenor banjo, harp, and various percussion instruments: marimbaphone, glockenspiel, crotales, boobam, tomtoms and kettle-drums. He explains his aims thus: ''All the instruments in my version have an Old Testament history behind them and date back to archaic times; yet thanks to a constant process of renewal and improvement, they are also the means of expression for the music of our own day. The sounds I have created with them evoke the feel and atmosphere of music in the Mediterranean world in biblical times, and in so doing my intention was to project the essence of Carissimi's score to our own day and make his musical tragedy of Jephthah and his daughter come alive in all its realism, glowing intensity and emotional power." The result is a masterly adaptation of the work of one composer by a later one. --
Albrecht Riethmiiller (Translation: John Bell)HANS WERNER HENZE
It has always been to Henze's advantage that he has never committed himself to a particular direction in music. He has thus avoided any pressure to conform; in this way his works have avoided the process of stereotyping and labeling so dear to the general public. (Whether this has changed since the end of the 1960's, when Henze completed a move towards politically committed music with a communist coloring will be discussed in another connection.) Despite approaching, and experimenting with, the twelve-tone, and more specifically the serial, method, Henze (born in Gütersloh in 1926) has never really gone over to it completely. The fact that he emigrated to Italy as early as 1953 may partly have been because Henze felt the recent past still cast too deep a shadow on the Federal Republic of Germany; in musical terms, the move meant that Henze's sensuous approach to sound and his art felt more at home in a southern environment, and it also brought about a physical separation from the creative musical situation in West Germany of that period, from his teachers, such as Wolfgang Fortner, and from the centers of new music, in particular from the bastion of serial composition in Kranichstein/Darmstadt.
Henze rapidly acquired a reputation from the beginning of his compositional career at the end of the Second World War because he was in less danger than others of being caught between two fronts, and because his music appealed more directly to a larger public than the often esoteric, brittle style of many of his colleagues. Another, even more important reason for his rapid success was that by the end of the 1950's he had produced a rich variety of vocal and instrumental works, of which the operas "Konig Hirsch" and "Der Prinz von Homburg", ballets like "Undine", and (by 1955) four symphonies spring to mind, although these are only points of orientation in his larger creative landscape. Henze's search for an individual musical language has also been (mis)understood as a rejection of the principles of new music, and Ulrich Dibelius went so far in 1966 as to speak of Henze's "Neoromantic music". This classification was not new; in a lecture given in 1959, Henze remarked on the "suspicion of Romanticism" which was "so difficult to fend off" as one was not sure whether, "if it proved to be justified it would really displease one".
Henze, whose comments at that time tended to be rather extravagant, spoke in the middle of the fifties of his "longing for a full, wild euphony", which could only be satisfied by a "feeling of loneliness and freedom". Henze's compositional aims of that period are perhaps best described in his own words: he aimed at music in which "poetry and subject are at one with their realization in sound". Consequently he was commended for his taste for "the most delicate of poetry" and for lyrical expression - whatever may be meant by that -, for sophisticated sound, and above all, for cantabile expression, and he was soon seen as an "over-sensitive musician", as a "singer of lovely, often dangerously lovely, melodies", as Bernd Müller remarked on the occasion of the first performance of "Nachtstucke und Arien" in 1957. Thus, Hans Heinz Stukkenschmidt, a music critic who closely followed and propagated the development of new music in Germany after the Second World War, ended a portrait of Henze in the same year as follows: "He is the richest in talent and breadth of horizon among the Germans of his generation."
Labels: Avant Garde Project, Giacomo Carissimi, Hans Werner Henze, jodru